Fed Up With Fake News?

A Guide to getting Fake News out of your life for good

A large number of people are having a hard time discerning real news from fake news.  I'm happy to tell you that, if you follow the general guidelines I've outlined below, it is actually easier to get Fake News (and intentional misinformation and disinformation) out of your life than you thought.

 

The 4 Quickest Steps to Getting Factual (Real) News:

     1)  Stop getting your news from TV and radio personalities and from Internet memes

     2)  Identify credible sources

     3)  Learn how spot the difference between news and opinion

     4)  Make fact-checkers your friend

 

1. Stop Getting Your News From TV (and Radio) personalities and from Internet Memes

TV News can be a slippery slope.  Just because someone says their news is Real or Fair or Balanced, doesn't make it true.  If you must get your news from TV, the best places to find factual, non-biased news is from the major network newscasts.  Those would include:

 

DINNER HOUR Broadcasts:

-- The PBS NewsHour -- online here: pbs.org/newshour/ 

-- ABC World News Tonight -- online here: abcnews.go.com/WN 

-- CBS Evening News -- online here: cbsnews.com/evening-news/ 

-- NBC Nightly News -- online here:  nbcnews.com/nightly-news 

NEWS SHOWS TO AVOID:

1) Talking heads

2) Panel discussions, generally with a moderator or host

3) Those relying upon opinions, sensationalism, demonization, ranting or judgments of others

 

THE BEST SOURCE FOR CURRENT NEWS 

(at any time):

Google News -- news.google.com

Google News is an aggregator of sources and they present the news by topic with numerous media sources provided for each story or subject.  That way users can choose which source to read or can read multiple sources.  Plus it's easy to navigate.  This is my go-to source to obtain accurate news.

 

2. Identify Credible Sources

The Internet has made it easier to find both disreputable sources of news, and reputable ones.  In your quest for reliable news sources, the best place to start is with organizations that rate news sources on the basis of their political bias and reliability based upon concrete, identifiable methodologies.   Those would include:

-- Ad Fontes Media's Media Bias Chart* -- Ad Fontes Media Bias Chart 

-- All Sides -- All Sides media-bias-ratings

-- Media Bias Fact Check - A reliable source, but now omitted here because of a very confusing web site loaded with not-so-clearly marked 3rd party ad links to questionable web sites.

*Ad Fontes also offers a very helpful link with which you can look up the neutrality and reliability of almost ANY source

Ad Fontes rankings-by-individual-news-source

 

Based on Ad Fontes Media and on All Sides, the following news sources are considered to be the most fair, reliable and unbiased in their presentation of the news (not including opinion articles):

-- The Associated Press

-- Reuters

-- NPR News (online)

-- USA Today

-- BBC News

-- Axios

-- PBS

-- The Christian Science Monitor

-- ABC News

-- CBS News

-- NBC News

-- The New York Times

-- The Washington Post

-- The Wall Street Journal

-- Forbes

-- Bloomberg

-- The Hill

Once you know which sources are reliable, you can switch back and forth between them (i.e.-- like on Google News) in order to get different, factual angles of the same story.  One thing to note: reputable news sources will correct any reporting errors once they become known.  Disreputable sources don't.

 

 

3. Learn how spot the difference between news and opinion

This one is easy -- providing you are starting with reputable new sources.  Just be aware that almost every news source offers a combination of news and editorial/opinion/analysis.  Credible print/Internet sources will clearly identify the nature of opinion articles, generally at the top with designations such as "Op-Ed"; "Opinion", "Editorial" or "Analysis".  Expect these to have an opinionated viewpoint of the subjects they are discussing. 

 

 

4. Make fact-checkers your friend

Most major media outlets nowadays offer some degree of fact-checking.  If the fact-checking source is reputable, their fact-checking will be too.  But there are also several other fact checking organizations that can be utilized.  Once you know which are trustworthy, you can utilize your search engine to see which of the fact checkers have addressed your inquiry.  

To fact check a questionable claim, simply put the words "Fact check" followed by the subject and claim you want to check.  If you don't get the results you are looking for, try rewording the claim or using a specific quote from the article or meme you are trying to check.  An example of this might be to search "Fact Check Does Facebook ban the posting of the Lord's Prayer?"

 

Here are some reliable third-party fact-checkers:

-- FactCheck.org 

-- Politifact 

-- Snopes

-- The Washington Post Fact Checker  

 

 

General Tips for Avoiding Fake News

-- Identify reliable sources and seek them out

-- Learn to recognize the difference between news and opinion

-- Ask WHY?  Does this make sense?

-- Verify doubtful/questionable claims using fact checkers

-- Avoid believing social media memes, talking heads, and cable news or radio personalities (on Fox, OAN, CNN, MSNBC, Limbaugh, InfoWars, etc.)

-- Read beyond the headline.  Headlines are often written to grab your attention with sensationalized claims

-- Trust your 'bullshit' detector.  If it sounds suspicious, look it up. 

-- If it makes a judgment or asks you to, it's not news

-- Read the news, rather than watch it.  It's harder to get away with lies and deceptions in print.

-- Use your search engine

 

Not all local media is trustworthy

Sadly, there has been a recent effort to deceptively portray corporately-sourced, partisan political opinions as coming from trusted local news anchors.  Ironically, the most abhorrent example of this came from Sinclair Broadcast Group and took the form of an editorial warning to viewers about "Fake News".  This warning was broadcast word-for-word on dozens of Sinclair-owned TV stations criticizing what they considered to be "Fake News" sources and describing them as "extremely dangerous to our democracy".  A number of journalists at those stations resigned rather than participate in the deliberate deception.  You can view a very creepy and disturbing video of the result here:  

Dozens of local Sinclair TV anchors reading the same script

Sinclair currently owns 193 TV stations in 100 American markets, owning multiple competing stations in some markets.  To see if your local station is one of them, you can view the database here: 

List of local TV stations owned or operated by Sinclair Broadcast Group

 

Learn to Identify Logical Fallacies

A Logical Fallacy is an attempt to use logical-sounding arguments to support illogical or intentionally erroneous conclusions.  Expressed another way, the underlying intent of a logical fallacy is to present falsehoods in a way that project the appearance of being factual.

Logical fallacies abound, especially on social media, talk radio and talk/opinion TV.  Here is a helpful link to a slide show which can help you:  1) identify them;  2) better understand what local fallacies look like;  3) and explain how users of logical fallacies try to manipulate you: 

12 Common Logical Fallacies and How to Debunk Them

 

Truth matters.  

Hopefully this post has made it easier for you to seek it out.

 

Today's headline - a brief lesson in how the news gets shaped and reported

Today's (Feb. 3, 2012) jobs report was seen as unexpectedly good news for the economy, but it's always interesting to see how different news sources report the information and how they use their headlines and lead paragraphs shape public opinion.

Not only was Fox News the only major source to lead with the negatives on what is clearly very good economic news, but nowhere in their headline or their opening paragraphs did they disclose the impressive number of new jobs created -- 243,000 -- something which every other major news source put right up front. 

Note that most major media provided the same or similar cautionary information that Fox did, but they focused on the positive news at the head of the article, unlike Fox which mitigated the good news with negatives right up front.  Studies show that most readers "skim" articles and read only the headlines and, maybe, the opening paragraph or two.  Once you know that, Fox News' bias becomes more apparent.


Here are the headlines and first paragraphs from news sources you know and trust(?):


FOX NEWS:
Unemployment rate falls to 8.3 percent in January after hiring burst
WASHINGTON – The unemployment rate dropped to 8.3 percent in January, marking the fifth straight month of decline thanks in part to a hiring spree in the private sector.

The Labor Department report suggests the job market is improving, though longer-term economic projections remain dim. The Congressional Budget Office reported earlier this week that its analysts predict the rate will creep toward 9 percent again before the end of the year.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/03/unemployment-rate-falls-to-83-percent-in-january-after-hiring-burst/



REUTERS:
Job growth surges, jobless rate drops to 8.3 percent
The economy created jobs at the fastest pace in nine months in January and the unemployment rate dropped to a near three-year low of 8.3 percent, providing some measure of comfort for President Barack Obama who faces re-election in November.

Nonfarm payrolls jumped 243,000, the Labor Department said on Friday, as factory jobs grew by the most in a year. The gain in overall employment was the largest since April and outpaced economists' expectations for a rise of only 150,000.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/03/us-usa-economy-idUSTRE7BM0AB20120203


LOS ANGELES TIMES:
Unemployment rate falls to 8.3%; fifth straight monthly decline
The U.S. job market strengthened at the start of the year as employers added an unexpectedly large number of new jobs and the unemployment rate in January dropped for the fifth straight month to 8.3%--the lowest in nearly three years.

The Labor Department said Friday that employers nationwide added 243,000 net new jobs in January – about 100,000 more than what analysts were forecasting. Job gains were broad-based, powered by increases in manufacturing, professional and business services such as accounting and engineering, and in leisure and healthcare industries.
http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-unemployment-january-report-20120203,0,6620355.story



BLOOMBERG:
Unemployment Rate Drops to 8.3%; Payrolls Jump
Employment climbed more than forecast in January and the U.S. jobless rate unexpectedly fell to the lowest in three years, casting doubt on the Federal Reserve’s pledge to keep interest rates low until late 2014.

The 243,000 increase in payrolls was the most since April and exceeded all forecasts in a Bloomberg News survey, Labor Department figures showed in Washington. The unemployment rate dropped to 8.3 percent, the lowest since February 2009.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-03/payrolls-in-u-s-jumped-243-000-in-january-unemployment-rate-drops-to-8-3-.html



THE WASHINGTON POST:
U.S. adds 243K jobs in January; unemployment rate drops to 8.3%
The nation’s unemployment rate dropped for the fifth straight month to 8.3 percent, its lowest level in three years, the Labor Department reported Friday, with widespread hiring across the economy.

The number of jobs grew by 243,000, the government said.

The Labor Department recorded gains in many parts of the economy including the restaurant business, accounting, health care and retail stores.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/us-adds-243k-jobs-in-january-unemployment-rate-drops-to-83percent/2012/02/03/gIQAhV3mmQ_story.html


THE NEW YORK TIMES:
U.S. Jobless Rate Falls to 8.3 Percent, a 3-Year Low
The United States economy gained momentum in January, adding 243,000 jobs, the second straight month of better-than-expected gains.

The unemployment rate fell to 8.3 percent, giving a cause for optimism as the economy shapes up as the central issue in the presidential election. The Labor Department’s monthly snapshot of the jobs market uses a different survey, of households rather than employers, to calculate the unemployment rate.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/04/business/economy/us-economy-added-243000-jobs-in-january-unemployment-rate-is-8-3.html?hp



CNN:
January jobs report: Hiring ramps up, unemployment falls
American employers substantially stepped up their hiring in January, bringing the unemployment rate down for the fifth month in a row.

Employers added 243,000 jobs in January, the Labor Department reported Friday, marking a pick-up in hiring from December, when the economy added 203,000 jobs.

Meanwhile, the unemployment rate fell to 8.3%. That is the lowest since February 2009.
http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/03/news/economy/jobs_report_unemployment/index.htm




Then, there's this that just showed up minutes later 

FOX NEWS:
The bad news behind the January jobs report
Three years after Obama became president, even the official unemployment rate still remains high. The newly released 8.3 percent unemployment rate is still a half a percentage point higher than when he took office.

But that still might be looking at the bright side. If we include those who have given up looking for work and those who could only find part time work, the unemployment rate stands at almost an entire percentage point higher than when Obama entered office.
http://nation.foxnews.com/jobs/2012/02/03/bad-news-behind-january-jobs-report


********************************

This message has been brought to you by your friends at:
LameStream Media Incorporated